Liquidity Infrastructure for Your Stakeholders

Traditional tender offers cost $200K-$500K and take 6+ months. M2M delivers continuous liquidity for employees and investors alike—in weeks, not months, at 75% lower cost.

Your Stakeholders Need Liquidity. Traditional Solutions Create Chaos.

Talent Retention Crisis

Top performers leave for companies offering liquidity while you’re stuck in 6-month tender offer cycles

Investor Distribution Pressure

Early backers, VCs, and LPs demanding returns. Fund managers need portfolio liquidity without forcing your exit

Tender Offer Burden

Expensive legal and tax compliance drains your finance team’s bandwidth from strategic priorities

12+ Year Path to Exit

Median time to IPO now exceeds 12 years. Employees, founders, and early investors can’t wait that long

The Real Cost

With extended paths to liquidity, you’re looking at 3-5+ tender offers minimum. That’s $1M+ in hard costs, hundreds of hours of team time, and mounting pressure from every stakeholder group—all while competitors with efficient liquidity programs gain strategic advantages.

Meanwhile, prospective investors in new funding rounds increasingly evaluate liquidity infrastructure as a signal of operational maturity; making it both a retention tool and a competitive fundraising advantage.

One Platform, Complete Liquidity Solution

SPV Structure Setup

Clean cap table with SPV as single shareholder of record. Beneficial owners maintain economic rights while company retains full control and transparency.

Tokenization Process

Digital certificates enable partial share sales, automated compliance checking, and elimination of manual transfer delays. Smart contracts enforce all company-defined restrictions.

Daily AI Valuations

mVal engine analyzes 4,000+ companies daily using machine learning trained on comprehensive transaction data. Real-time market signals replace stale 18+ month old funding rounds.

Institutional Marketplace

Curated network of qualified institutional buyers seeking transparent private market access. Professional settlement infrastructure with institutional custody standards.

Efficient Settlement

T+2 settlement vs. 30-90 day traditional timelines. Automated compliance, instant verification of transfer restrictions, and professional transaction management.

Continue reading below for Employee Liquidity Programs, or jump ahead to learn about Investor & Shareholder Solutions.

Retain Top Talent Without the Tender Offer Burden

Solve retention challenges with continuous liquidity access—delivered in ~4 weeks instead of 6+ months, at 75% lower cost, with minimal burden on your finance team.

The Employee Retention Challenge

Your top talent now expects liquidity access. Without it, they’re choosing:

Public companies with liquid stock compensation
Competitors who’ve solved the liquidity problem
Earlier-stage companies offering faster paths to exit

The Traditional Response: Run expensive tender offers every 12-18 months, consuming your finance team and draining resources that should drive growth.

The M2M Advantage: Continuous liquidity infrastructure that costs a fraction of tender offers and operates with minimal company involvement.

Key Benefits

Solve retention challenges without company cash while maintaining full control over your liquidity program.

Solve Retention Without Company Cash

Provide liquidity to employees and investors without depleting your balance sheet. Third-party institutional capital funds all transactions—you maintain your cash for growth while solving stakeholder needs.

Maintain Full Control

You decide who participates, when programs run, transaction volumes, and which institutional buyers qualify. Set eligibility criteria, approval workflows, and information governance to match your company’s policies.

Clean Cap Table

SPV structure keeps your cap table simple with a single entry. No fragmentation across hundreds of buyers, no administrative burden tracking countless small shareholders, no complications for future financing rounds or exit events.

Real-Time Valuation Data

Daily mVal updates provide transparent, AI-powered fair market valuations versus 18+ month-old funding round prices. Make informed decisions about program pricing, timing, and strategic planning with current market data.

Traditional Tender Offers vs. M2M

Metric Traditional Tender Offer M2M Capital
Timeline 6+ months of planning, approvals, & Settlement Typically under 4 weeks
Company Cost $200K – $500K in legal, tax, admin Minimal company expense
Who Pays Cost Company bears the burden Employees / Sellers
Finance Team Heavy: Ongoing project management Low: M2M handles operations
Tax Administration Company must withhold and remit Handled through M2M
Simplified Cap Table Multiple employees and investors SPV listed on Cap Table
Individual Investor Visibility Blind to who's inside SPVs—only see entity level Full transparency: see every individual holder, even within SPVs
Information Access Control SPV manager controls who sees company info Company decides who accesses financials and updates
Voting Rights Can be diluted through SPVs Company retains control
Frequency Episodic: 1 – 2x per year max Continuous access
Scalability Becomes harder as you grow Scales automatically

CFO ROI: The Numbers That Matter

3-Event Cost Comparison

TRADITIONAL

$950K – $1.6M

Hard costs across 3 tender offer events

  • $200K-$500K per event
  • Legal, tax, admin fees
  • Hundreds of team hours
  • 6+ months per event

M2M

$150K – $200K

Total investment for continuous liquidity infrastructure

  • ~$50K-$75K per year
  • Ongoing access for stakeholders
  • Minimal team involvement
  • 4-week setup

You Save

$1M+

Over your pre-IPO journey

  • 75% cost reduction
  • Retain top talent
  • Maintain strategic control
  • Real-time transparency

Save $1M+ Over Your Pre-IPO Journey

Each liquidity round without M2M costs $125K-$150K+ in unnecessary fees and lost time, plus increased risk of losing key talent and strained investor relationships.

Get Started

Ready to Unlock Liquidity?

Schedule a 30-minute discovery call to explore how M2M can solve your stakeholder liquidity challenges.

Satisfy Investor Distribution Demands Without IPO Pressure

Provide controlled liquidity to early investors, VCs, and strategic shareholders while maintaining your timeline to exit. All without fragmenting your cap table or forcing premature decisions.

The Investor Liquidity Challenge

LP Distribution Demands

Fund investors expecting returns need liquidity before traditional exit timelines

Early Stakeholder Needs

Angel investors and early employees seeking partial liquidity after years of commitment

Fund Strategy Shifts

VCs needing to rebalance portfolios or return capital to meet changing fund mandates

Board & Strategic Pressure

Growing pressure from board members and strategic investors for liquidity events

The Traditional Response vs M2M Advantage

TRADITIONAL

Forced Decisions

Pressure-driven exits and fragmented cap tables

  • Force early IPO or sale
  • Secondary market chaos
  • Complex negotiations
  • Months-old valuations

M2M

Controlled Liquidity

Strategic investor management on your timeline

  • Controlled distributions
  • No IPO pressure
  • Clean cap table
  • Real-time pricing

You Save

Stay in Control

While satisfying investor needs and keeping strategic vision

  • Maintain your timeline
  • Protect cap table
  • Preserve relationships
  • Strategic flexibility

Common Investor Liquidity Use Cases

M2M’s investor liquidity solutions address a wide range of stakeholder needs—from fund lifecycle management to personal financial planning—without forcing premature exits or disrupting company strategy.

Early VC Needs Distribution

Series A investor’s fund is nearing end of life and needs to return capital to LPs without forcing the company into a premature exit or sale.

Angel Investor Partial Exit

Early angel wants to take some chips off the table after 8+ years of commitment while maintaining their long-term position and relationship with the company.

Strategic Partner Rebalancing

Corporate strategic investor needs to reduce exposure for portfolio management reasons without signaling lack of confidence in the company’s future.

Founder Secondary

Founder wants modest liquidity for personal financial planning—home purchase, estate planning, or diversification—without triggering board or investor concerns.

Fund Strategy Pivot

VC firm is shifting investment thesis or stage focus and needs to exit select positions gracefully while maintaining founder and LP relationships.

Estate Planning Needs

Long-time investor or board member requires liquidity for estate planning, charitable giving, or family trust distribution purposes.

Strategic Advantage: Enhanced Fundraising Position

Signal investor-friendly governance while differentiating in competitive rounds

Prospective investors increasingly evaluate liquidity infrastructure as a signal of operational maturity and stakeholder-friendly governance. Companies with established programs demonstrate sophistication that late-stage capital expects.

Beyond retention benefits, liquidity programs create competitive advantages in fundraising conversations—new investors gain confidence knowing flexible exit paths exist beyond traditional IPO timelines, making your company more attractive in competitive rounds.

How It Works for Investors

Our streamlined process connects investor liquidity needs with institutional capital through transparent, compliant infrastructure.

01

Company Opt Ins

Company approves investor liquidity program and defines eligible participants, timing windows, volume parameters, and approval rights.

02

Investor Expresses Interest

Eligible investors submit intent to participate, specifying desired liquidity amount and any timing preferences or constraints.

03

SPV Structure Setup

M2M establishes an SPV to hold shares, maintaining clean cap table while enabling fractional liquidity.

04

Tokenization & Pricing

Shares are tokenized as digital certificates with daily mVal AI-powered pricing, providing real-time transparency versus stale valuations.

05

Institutional Match & Settlement

M2M connects sellers with vetted institutional buyers and delivers T+2 settlement with professional custody.

Your Control Over the Process

M2M provides the infrastructure—you maintain complete authority over every aspect of your investor liquidity program.

Complete Control Framework

You maintain authority over five critical dimensions:

Participation Control

Decide exactly which investors and shareholders are eligible—by class, vintage, or individual approval.

Timing & Volume Control

Set liquidity windows, define maximum transaction volumes, and pace liquidity to match your strategic timeline.

Buyer Approval

Review and approve all buyers before transactions complete. Control who joins your cap table.

Information Governance

Control exactly what company information buyers receive—protecting sensitive data while attracting quality capital.

Fundraising Messaging

Use established liquidity programs as proof points in investor presentations for new funding rounds.

Why This Matters

01

No Premature Pressure

Provide liquidity without forcing IPO timelines or accepting unwanted investors.

02

Cap Table Integrity

SPV structure keeps your cap table clean while enabling fractional liquidity for stakeholders.

03

Strategic Flexibility

Adjust program parameters as your company evolves—M2M infrastructure adapts to your needs.

04

Transparent Process

Real-time visibility into program activity, transaction status, and participant engagement.

Market Forces Make This a Strategic Imperative, Not a Nice-to-Have

War For Talent

Top engineers command $300K+ packages at public companies with liquid equity.

Your illiquid RSUs are losing talent to competitors who’ve solved the liquidity problem.

First movers in your sector are already retaining key employees 40% longer.

Extended Time to Exit

The median time to IPO is now 12+ years.

That’s not 1-2 tender offers—it’s 3-5+ liquidity events minimum.

At $200K-$500K each, you’re looking at $1M+ in hard costs alone, plus hundreds of hours from your finance team.

Institutional Pressure

Your VCs face LP distribution pressure. Early employees are exercising options at expiration. Board members need portfolio rebalancing.

These aren’t problems that go away—they compound with every quarter you delay providing efficient liquidity solutions.

Operating Efficiency

Every tender offer consumes 200+ hours of finance team bandwidth: valuation work, legal coordination, shareholder communications, transaction management.

M2M’s infrastructure handles this continuously with 90% less internal resource drain.

Fundraising Advantage

Prospective investors value companies with established liquidity infrastructure.

Signal operational maturity and stakeholder-friendly governance in funding conversations.

Differentiate your company with exit flexibility that sophisticated capital increasingly expects.

The question isn’t whether to provide liquidity. The question is whether you’ll do it efficiently or expensively.

SEE Your True Market Value

See how mVal values your company daily versus your last funding round.

Track your company plus 4 competitors FREE!

Implementation

Timeline: 4 weeks

Most programs launch within one month

  • Current cap table information
  • Legal approval for SPV structure
  • Stakeholder communications plan
  • Definition of eligibility criteria and transaction parameters

What Happens Next

1. 30-Minute Discovery Call

We learn about your liquidity challenges, stakeholder needs, and timeline requirements. No pressure, no sales pitch—just a clear conversation about whether M2M fits your situation.

2. Custom ROI Analysis

We build a specific cost comparison for your company: traditional tender offers vs. M2M infrastructure over your pre-IPO timeline. See exactly how much you’ll save.

R

3. Pilot Program Design

We design a tailored pilot program with defined eligibility, timing, and approval workflows. You maintain full control while we handle the infrastructure and institutional matching.

Each liquidity round without M2M costs $125K-$150K+ in unnecessary fees and lost time, plus increased risk of losing key talent and strained investor relationships.